Paul Zondagh

Executive Director | True South Actuaries & Consultants

Paul Zondagh is a [tired] father of four children (aged 20, 18, 16, 13) and a husband (to one wife only!).
He’s an avid reader (but for the last 20 years hasn’t really had enough time to actually read a lot).
He’s a cautious cyclist (with a strong preference for routes made up of long, gradual downhills).
He’s one of the founding partners of True South, an actuarial consultancy (established 2001).

CONTRIBUTIONS TO FAITH DRIVEN ENTREPRENEUR

The Bible

The Bible

We believe that God speaks to us through His word and that all of Scripture is useful for instruction on how to live, work, and serve in any capacity. Scripture, when taken in aggregate, provides us with a great handbook on every question of life and entrepreneurship.

If you need a book to start with, this is the one. It’s easy to overlook, but it’s vital if we want to steward our life and our business for God’s glory.

If you’re not sure where to start, check out our resources to help you stay connected to God’s Word.

Click on the book cover to check out the Reviews and Purchase at Amazon


Faith in the Heart of Corporate Restructure

— by Ryan Ramsdale

Being a believer in a large organization is a rich ministry opportunity with large ripples of influence. At the same time, it presents frequent challenges in your leadership as there are tasks to accomplish that will cause you to reflect on what your convictions are and define your approach to several choices and actions. 

God calls us to be vessels of love and mercy. He equips us to bear unique characteristics in the often competitive whirlwind of corporate life; but how do we exemplify this fruit when the strategy demands difficult action? The onset of corporate restructures has become so frequent in our society that it is just another discipline with an abundance of resources in print or supported by consulting firms. 

As a Christian leader in business, how do you navigate the difficult waters of restructuring? What is God’s view on this activity? How can we minister when our task is to carry out massive cuts in jobs impacting individuals, families and the health of the economy in our region? Here are a few situations and perspectives that help understand some of the truths in this complex problem. 

First, if the strategy to restructure is unethical, vindictive or reflects any other signs that challenge your convictions, you may be facing a bigger decision. What role can you play with a clear conscience? Dedicated prayer focussed on your ability to participate is necessary which may result in a difficult choice to depart from the organization. It is more likely however that an organization has to make this difficult decision to remain competitive or even avoid approaching insolvency. In either way the accountability falls on the Christian leader to execute on a plan that involves many unpleasantries. 

An important thing to keep in mind is that while a task may be daunting or unpleasant it does not mean that it’s inherently wrong. With such a complex, multi-faceted event as an organizational restructure there will always be a blend of positives and negatives. 

Life and leadership are always full of difficult decisions. 

A restructure is no different. It is the next challenge to pass through and like all challenges requires deep connection to the Spirit on a moment by moment basis as the event approaches and passes. Knowing that you have done your part in line with the Spirit will reassure you of your actions. 

God is in control. 

We are not the ones who need to ensure everything will work out perfectly for everyone involved. While we have the opportunity to provide generosity in severances and support services, God loves the affected individuals more than we can and has better things intended for them whatever that looks like. 

Don’t personalize the event. 

Many times, regardless of how agnostic restructures claim to be, names were chosen through some sort of rating process. Perhaps as the leader you had this direct accountability to choose who stays and who goes. Often performance histories, and prior results are contributing factors to forming the team of the future. If you are saying farewell to historical low-performers have a clean heart by ensuring you take no pleasure in “settling the score” for any past aggravation their performance has caused. This cannot be about revenge for inconveniences in your life and career. Ask God for wisdom and direction as this sensitive selection process is made. 

Understand the deep roots of value and self-worth in human kind. 

While the loss of career can become a crippling event, know that truth is God’s will for each person involved. Whether the person on the other side of the desk is aware of it or not yet, their value is not defined by the job they are loosing or will gain in the future. This step may play a significant part in their search for the deeper fulfilment from a relationship with Jesus. With that said, understand you aren’t doing them any favours either, but you should also recognize that you are not making a statement that you believe they are of no value. If you approach the exit 

planning and conversation with an appreciation, even love for their value, your ministry of grace will shine through the grey-cloud of the restructure. 

Pray for each person. 

Pray deeply for each person who you will be saying farewell to by name as well as their family members whenever possible. Your desire for God’s best for each person will be a fuel that displays a supernatural mercy in an otherwise heartless event.

Related articles

——

[ Photo by Kelly Sikkema on Unsplash ]

How Budgeting Increases the Joy of Generosity

This article was originally published here.

by Bill Wichterman and Dana Wichterman

Not many people like to budget or keep track of their expenses. But we do. That makes us a bit . . . unusual. Still, we’d like to make the case for the increased joy that comes from following a budget.

First, giving is much more fun when you’ve already decided how much you’ll give away that year. Donating to charities becomes a question of where to give rather than how much to give. There’s no pain in thinking about how much money you’re forgoing, because you’ve already given it away in your heart. If X percent of your money (and we believe 10% should be the floor, but not the ceiling, for Christians) is automatically designated to be given away, then deciding where to give is almost like getting free tickets at a carnival.

Second, saying no to emotional appeals for a charity that lies outside your planned giving is less heart-wrenching. Once you have given your planned amount, it’s easier not to feel guilty about not giving. Your budget has been set, and you can feel more peace about saying no. But if you don’t have an agreed upon amount to give away, then you may find yourself wrestling with every appeal.

And it’s not true that we should always give more. It’s possible to give away more money than the Lord wants – and I know people who have done just that and later regret it. All of our money belongs to God, not just that which we give away. The Lord has given us responsibilities to pay our bills, save for the future, care for our families, etc. It may well be ungodly to give to charity that which should go elsewhere. A careful, prayerful plan well-executed is pleasing to God.

Is it possible that the Lord might call us to change our plans and give more than we budgeted? Sure, He does that sometimes. But most of the time, a thoughtful plan bathed in prayer is how the Lord leads.

If you live within a budget for your lifestyle and your tithe, what about spontaneous generosity that falls in the gray area not typically thought of as charitable giving? If you’re too planned, wouldn’t that preclude on-the-spot generosity? Nope – not if you plan for that, too. We budget a specific percentage of our gross income (above our other planned giving) for spontaneous non-tax deductible giving. That way, we can pay for a friend’s meal or anything else that wouldn’t usually be considered “charity” and where there isn’t a true need, but is still an expression of generosity. Here again, giving becomes more fun when it’s part of a responsible plan.

And we also build in flexibility with our regular planned tithe, with a portion set aside for the inevitable appeals that we can’t predict but want to respond to (short-term mission trips, etc.). If it doesn’t get used during the year, it gets added to one of our regular charities as an add-on. Hence, we budget in flexibility in our planned and unplanned giving.

It’s true that budgeting still means saying no to spending outside the budget, and that’s never easy. But that’s what stewardship is all about – saying no to some things so we can say yes to other things.

Budgeting also extends to peace in other areas of our lives. For instance, budgeting for “unexpected” auto expenses just makes good sense, and it can help to reduce stress when our car breaks down – it’s in the budget! It also will inject reality into our budgeting and make us realize how little discretionary income we really have.

There’s another cost of budgeting: keeping track of your expenses. Budgets lie. An accurate record of expenses doesn’t. It’s easy to draft a hopelessly unrealistic budget, as we did the first year of our marriage. We kept thinking we could live on less than we could. But a budget based on last year’s actual expenses, adjusted for the cost of living, is far more likely to be a real budget. And it helps us confront those uncomfortable truths, like knowing how much you really spent at Starbucks. And once we know the truth, we can better make needed adjustments. Not keeping track of expenses may be a way of shielding us from what we’d rather not know.

It’s a hassle to keep track of expenses, but there are so many useful tools to help make tracking expenses easier. We use Quicken, but many software programs will help to assign categories to expenses we download from our bank or credit card account. Spending a couple hours per month keeping track of expenses is worth the freedom of living in reality.

For the ambitious, categorizing your giving (church, evangelism, discipleship, poverty, cultural renewal, etc.) can help you decide how much to give to specific areas. We tend to give more financially to areas that receive less of our time (since giving of our time is another form of stewardship). There’s no magic formula, but examining your giving is another metric to help you lean into the joy of intentional living.

Wise stewardship of our money is integral to following Jesus. Jesus repeatedly warned his followers about the dangers of misusing money. Following a budget can help us experience more joy in serving him by what we give, spend, and save. It’s not easy, but the effort pays dividends in decreased stress and increased joy.

This article was originally published here by Oakton Foundation

Related articles

——

[ Photo by Kelly Sikkema on Unsplash ]

Sustaining Business as a Ministry (BAAM) in Perpetuity

This is one of the 2020 CEF Whitepapers. For more information on the Christian Economic Forum, please visit their website here.

— by Brandt Brereton

Role of BaaMs in the United States

Approximately 2,000 private businesses in the United States are currently owned by committed Christians who provide varying levels of support for domestic and international ministry and missions within and outside the company. Because most of these business owners believe that God is the actual owner and that they are merely stewards, the title of Businesses as a Ministry (BaaM) has been adopted to characterize them. The profits of these companies fuel giving to the Kingdom both directly and through owner tithing to local churches and mission budgets. BaaM owners are stewards that view the operation, culture, and rich ministry within and through the business as something to be preserved.

The owners of BaaMs face unique financial difficulties as they manage their business because of the importance of maintaining owner control in order to continue ministry support both during and after their involvement in the business. The provision of shareholder liquidity and funding the retirement of owners is complicated by the difficulty in obtaining capital from traditional sources because of a portion of profits being diverted to ministry support both inside and outside of the company. BaaMs require access to a type of capital that does not require them to give up control of their business.  

Private Equity Acquisition Trend

Of the approximately 100,000 companies in America that employ at least 100 employees, it is estimated that an average of 4,000 of these companies have been acquired each year by private equity firms since the early 1990s. It is reasonable to infer from these numbers that 30% to 40% of private companies with at least 100 employees are now owned by secular private equity firms focused exclusively on profit. This trend will continue for demographic reasons as Baby Boomer private business owners reach retirement age.

Owners of private businesses who want to liquidate all or a part-interest in their company typically sell to a private equity firm. This prevalent practice is a consequence of one of two unfortunate situations. The first is that the typical owner and management team are not aware of any alternative means of obtaining significant liquidity while maintaining control of the company. The second is that most of the outside financial and legal advisors providing guidance to management are typically not familiar with any alternative to a business sale to a third-party private equity firm or strategic industry buyer.

Liquidity Options for Business Owners

When a business that allocates a portion of profits to ministry support (BaaM) is acquired by a private equity firm or industry buyer, the diversion of a portion of profit to ministry support will be immediately terminated as will any ministry occurring for employees within the organization.  

There is an urgent need for private business owners to be made aware of an alternative to the prevalent practice of selling a business to private equity firms or industry buyers in order to obtain the liquidity necessary to fund the retirement of owners. This alternative liquidity option would provide the following advantages:

  • Fund the retirement / major liquidity distributions for owners

  • Enable continuation / succession of owner control of the company

  • Permit the diversion of significant profit for charitable purposes

  • Facilitate beneficial employee stock ownership without cost to employee   

  • Enable permanent reduction or elimination of corporate level taxes

In addition to the above benefits, significant personal tax advantages would be available to cover costs of implementing and taking advantage of such an alternative.

 

Inception of the Employment Stock Ownership Plan

The employee stock ownership plan (ESOP), also alternatively known as the employee share ownership trust (ESOT), was conceived in 1956 by Louis Kelso, a San Francisco attorney and investment banker. A book written by Louis Kelso and the author and philosopher Mortimer Adler, and published in 1958, The Capitalist Manifesto, explained the macro-economic theory upon which the ESOP initiative was based.   

The thesis of the book is that democracy is the only method of government worthy for human beings and that capitalism is the only system that can sustain democracy, because only in the possession of the means of production can a person be truly free. The authors also wrote (over 60 years ago!) that we faced a real and present danger from the progressive socialization of our economy. They recommended that tax policy should be implemented to encourage beneficial ownership of stock by employees to supplement their income and preserve our capitalist system.

As a consequence of the work by Louis Kelso for nearly two decades, his proposals were finally incorporated into a major reform of retirement law known as ERISA (Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974). Among the beneficial provisions are the following:

  • ESOP-owned companies receive tax deductions for payments to employees

  • Employees receive beneficial stock ownership at no cost

  • ESOP trusts could borrow money to buy company stock

  • Loans can be repaid out of tax-deductible corporate contributions

  • Deferral or elimination of capital gains for certain sellers of stock to ESOP

National Center for Employee Ownership (NCEO)

The National Center for Employee Ownership (NCEO) – a private non-profit membership-based information and research organization – was founded in 1981 by Corey Rosen, who had worked as a professional staffer in the U.S. Senate where he helped draft ESOP legislation. The purpose of the organization is to educate business owners on employee stock ownership and managers of ESOP-owned companies on measurement and improvement of their ownership cultures. NCEO also produces publications and ESOP sample documents for the benefit of their membership. 

The ESOP Playbook

In 2017, my partner, Jared Hanley, and I wrote and published the ESOP Playbook. Jared and I are the two principals of Brereton Hanley, a boutique investment bank in Silicon Valley. Our objective in writing was to utilize our extensive experience in advising companies for more than two decades regarding ESOPs to accomplish two purposes. The first was to explain what an ESOP is and how a typical sale to an ESOP is conducted. The second was to provide an introduction to the many tools and alternatives that an ESOP can provide to a business. Because business owners can sell even 100% of their shares and still retain control of the company indefinitely, our hope is that this expertise can be taught and focused on the attrition of BaaMs problem.

A unique and very helpful feature of the book is the comparative analysis of the three most common corporate finance transactions: (1) the M&A (industry buyer) sale, (2) the Private Equity sale, and (3) the ESOP sale. For each type of transaction, the process is described, the parties and their agendas are discussed, and the pros and cons of the respective finance transaction types are enumerated. The parties covered for each transaction type are sellers, buyers, attorneys, CPAs, investment bankers, and employees.    

Emergence of Perpetuate Capital  

My partner and I recently joined a team of Christian entrepreneurs forming an investment fund organization (Perpetuate Capital) to provide a market-based source of capital to Christian-owned businesses without detrimentally impacting their culture, independent control, legacy, and ministry. Investor returns are targeted at or above historical secular market averages, which can be achieved by the right professionals.

Among the uses of the capital could be the purchase of shares held by a departing owner in a private company by using an ESOP, funding traditional management-led buyouts without the use of an ESOP, aiding in the divesting and acquiring of subsidiaries, and providing growth capital to profitable businesses. Perpetuate Capital exists to perpetuate the Kingdom impacts of BaaMs, while solving for shareholder liquidity at market-based costs/returns with fully aligned investors.

The key component of the initiative is the establishment of a structured equity fund that will accept investments of any denomination only from Christian individuals and entities and only provide that capital to BaaMs. The objective of the fund is to provide a return in the ballpark of 12%, which is the average return for secular structured equity funds over the last 25 years. Additional information about Perpetuate Capital and our partners can be found on our website at www.perpetuatecapital.com.  

My partners in this venture and I feel privileged to dedicate our God-given experience sets and what remains of our earthly sojourns to focusing on this achievable solution to a very tragic but avoidable problem. We are optimistic that the Kingdom-giving of existing BaaMs can not only be preserved but increased. We are also hopeful that additional Christian-owned businesses can be transitioned to BaaMs with this new knowledge and capital provision.

Related articles

——

[ Photo by Dylan Ferreira on Unsplash ]

How to Increase Authority by Being Vulnerable in Crises

Andy Crouch, partner for theology and culture at Praxis, joined us to talk about the drama of leadership and how to navigate the tensions of authority and vulnerability as a faith driven entrepreneur. 

Andy presents a 2×2 matrix and explains the surprising reality that “authority and vulnerability go together at the moments of greatest flourishing in our lives.” Listen in to hear his call to reconsider the role authority, vulnerability, control, and safety play in our lives.